注册 登录  
 加关注
   显示下一条  |  关闭
温馨提示!由于新浪微博认证机制调整,您的新浪微博帐号绑定已过期,请重新绑定!立即重新绑定新浪微博》  |  关闭

论老子

道,领导也。领导必需要不断呼唤,教导下属以及以身作则。下属的过和错皆因领导懒惰。

 
 
 

日志

 
 

Chapter 32: Likeability  

2012-06-24 11:01:31|  分类: Buffer Mentality |  标签: |举报 |字号 订阅

  下载LOFTER 我的照片书  |

I have noticed recently that people like to work with likeable people, even if these nice people do not know very much or produce much value or are simply incompetent. This probably explains why most companies do not do well.

If you look at the major car manufacturers in the world outside China, Toyota Motor Corporation is the only outstanding carmaker. Its profit is higher than the combined profits of all its competitors. The Toyota Production System is one of the reasons for its excellent profitability.

The Toyota Production System has been well studied by many great manufacturing companies all over the world, but surprisingly only few companies outside Japan has implemented it within the last fifty years.

In 1985, Professor Daniel T. Jones spent US$5 million and five years to study 90 different car factories in the world. In 1992, he published the book, “The machine that changed the world.” He used Toyota Production system as the reference for Lean Production System. Lean in this context means that there is little waste in the production system.

It has been almost two decades since the introduction of the generalized concept of Lean Production System14, yet the wide spread implementation of this system has not really taken off.

It has not been able to get a foothold in many companies. One of the main reasons why CEOs of most manufacturing companies do not favor the idea of implementing the lean production system is because they do not want to be seen as a nasty boss. Everyone wants to be a likeable manager or a nice CEO. Let me elaborate on how the elimination of seven wastes is prevented due to our instinctive desire as a human to be someone who is likeable.

 

Waste of Over-production

 

When one produces something that will eventually be sold, one tends to over-produce. Conventional wisdom suggests that it is best to keep enough inventories of finished goods so that if there is a sudden increase in demand, it will avert an out-of-stock situation. An out-of-stock situation is undesirable because the company is going to lose sales. And it is unpleasant to be in a situation where you are the guilty person. The sales and marketing department do not like such situation to occur, so does the CEO. Thus, the easiest way to be likeable is to over-produce.

 

Waste of Inventory

 

With the advance of computers, changes to a production plan can be executed by a few keystrokes. Order changes can be disseminated to all the affected work centers fairly quickly.

However, the production planners do realize that changes to the production plan can cause a lot of troubles for the production people.

To accommodate a production plan change, machines have to stop producing a particular product and WIP is moved aside to make way for the new order. This WIP becomes dead inventory for that time being. Whenever there is a change in the production plan, more WIP will be pulled aside and accumulated at every available production shop floor space. Production folks dislike the hassle if they have to keep on switching products. In order to be nice to the production folks, the production planners plan for large batch for each product run.

This keeps the production people happy because of infrequent switching. However, the increased inventory level is a form of waste that ties up capital dollars.

 

Waste of Transportation

 

In NatSteel Ltd, the general manager of the technical division bought an overhead crane to transfer the billets from the billet yard to the reheating furnace of the rolling mill. The crane costs a few hundred thousand Singapore dollars.

A young engineer studied the handling process of the overhead crane and found that it was extremely slow and inefficient. He suggested installing a roller conveyor that links up the billet casting machine and the reheating furnace of the rolling mills to save the energy cost used to reheat the cold billets.

The operations manager stopped him from implementing that idea. He said that the proposal would make the overhead crane’s function to be redundant and that would cause the general manager to lose face. A good idea was killed just because the operations manager wanted to be someone who is likeable.

 

Waste of Motion

 

If you tour a typical assembly line, it would not be surprising that some production workers carry out a lot of unnecessary physical micro-motions in the eyes of a trained industrial engineer. Why is that so? Does the current industrial engineer not carry out his time study properly and train the workers well?

The real situation is not that simple.

After a short period of job familiarization, a production worker will know how fast she can get the job done. If her production supervisor gives her a job that takes her eight hours to complete, she will do it with the least motion fearing that she might not be able to complete the task in time. If the production supervisor assigns her only a task with four-hour worth of work, she will add a considerable amount of unnecessary motions and maybe, slow down her pace too. Why is that so?

That is because she does not want to be seen as the only worker to finish the job in half a day while the rest of the workers are still trying to complete that day’s workload. She does not want to be disliked by the rest of the workers for inviting the production supervisor to put pressure on them. She wants to be a likeable fellow worker.

 

Waste of Waiting

 

I have a Malaysian friend named James Ho who migrated to Australia. He set up a Compact Disc stamping company for the local market. He had to import the blank CDs by himself. One day he went to the cargo hanger to collect the blank CDs.

The airport worker who was driving a forklift was in the process of unloading the pallet of CDs from the cargo plane. The whole pallet was already raised off the cargo floor. For no reason, he stopped the forklift engine, got off the driver’s seat and walked away. James waited for quite a while wondering where the driver had gone to.

James lost his patience and went over to ask an officer why that forklift driver made the job left unfinished. The officer replied that the workers went for their tea break at 3pm sharp and would only be back in half an hour.

James asked, “Couldn’t he just finish loading the pallet into my truck before leaving for his tea-break? It might just take him another minute to do so.”

The officer smiled and replied, “Hey! You never understand what it means to be respectful to your fellow worker’s right.”

It is sad to hear such a response. This is not a question of respect but rather a widespread behavior of trying to be someone who is likeable. The worker unions in Australia are very powerful. None of the officers want to be reported for being nasty. This is one of the reasons why very few multinational companies want to set up a subsidiary plant in Australia – which is a great economic loss to Australia.

 

Waste of Processing

 

In Archive Singapore, the first pass yield for computer tape backup drive was 60 percent. That means 40 percent of the drives had to be sent to the “pile of bones” for rework. The root cause of the low yield was that the screw was too short to tighten the nut. With only one and a half turn of the screw thread available, that was barely sufficient to provide enough grips to secure the read-write head into position permanently.

The rework process was a form of waste of processing that does not add value to the product. However, the Quality Director did not want to make his American counterparts, who did the design to be upset with a constant stream of feedback on the same quality issue. So, he just kept quiet. But the price to pay for this likeable behavior was four years of low first pass yield.

 

Waste of Quality

 

According to Statistical Process Control guidelines, whenever an out-of-control situation occurs, the process owners need to investigate the cause immediately. In an American MNC that I once worked for, the process engineers found it very frustrating to stop doing a task on hand to attend to the out-of-control situation.

Thus, in order to circumvent the common industrial practice of responding immediately to an out-of-control situation, the engineers innovatively added a diamond box in the response plan flowchart. The diamond box reads, “3 Consecutive points OOC?” If “Yes” then call engineer. If “No,” resume production.

Figure 32-1: American MNC’s unique response plan

 

Assuming the process was already out-of-control, it had shifted away from the process mean of let’s say, producing defects at 10% rate. This means that there was only a 10% chance a point plotted on the control chart to be out-of-control.

The chance for the next point to fall outside the control limits was also ten percent. It was the same for the third data point.

What is the chance that three consecutive points would fall outside the control limits? The answer was 0.1 percent (0.1 x 0.1x 0.1 = 0.001), which was much lower than 0.27 percent. The response plan had effectively mitigated the need to call the engineers to go down to the production floor to perform an investigation even though the process was indeed already running out-of-control at a 10 percent reject rate.

The production operators noticed that the number of rejects increased and they had to perform a lot of unnecessary rescreening and subsequent rework. The statistician was called in to answer whether it was acceptable for non-investigation of repeated out-of-control situations. Could the production of rejects be stopped in time?

The statistician knew that there was nothing wrong with the control charts. She knew it was the response plan’s failure to get the operators to alert the process engineers but she kept quiet about it. If she had pointed this out, she would incur the wrath from all the process engineers. She chose to be a likeable person.

The above examples of resistant to adopt change explain why very few companies adopt the lean production system. Even if a company hires a lean production consultant, it is not going to be easy for him to overcome the resistance to change from the entire workforce, especially when everyone is so fearful of being disliked.

 


 

  评论这张
 
阅读(163)| 评论(0)
推荐

历史上的今天

在LOFTER的更多文章

评论

<#--最新日志,群博日志--> <#--推荐日志--> <#--引用记录--> <#--博主推荐--> <#--随机阅读--> <#--首页推荐--> <#--历史上的今天--> <#--被推荐日志--> <#--上一篇,下一篇--> <#-- 热度 --> <#-- 网易新闻广告 --> <#--右边模块结构--> <#--评论模块结构--> <#--引用模块结构--> <#--博主发起的投票-->
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

页脚

网易公司版权所有 ©1997-2017